211208120544 06 elizabeth holmes theranos fraud trial 1207 restricted super tease

Elizabeth Holmes trial: what it’s essential to know when jury deliberations start

[ad_1]

It’s been greater than three years since Holmes, now 37, was first criminally indicted, with delays as a result of pandemic in addition to the delivery of Holmes’ first youngster. he has been fraud examined in process for greater than three months in a San Jose federal courtroom.

Here’s what it’s essential to know to catch up because the jury’s deliberations start.

Holmes dropped out of Stanford on the age of 19 to work on Theranos. Nearly a decade later, in 2013, she took Unveiling the corporate, saluting the press, and saying a retail partnership with Walgreens. Theranos claims to have invented expertise that may precisely and reliably check for a spread of situations with just some drops of blood.

Elizabeth Holmes' defense defends her case

Holmes raised $945 million from the likes of media mogul Rupert Murdoch, former schooling secretary Betsy DeVos, and the inheritor to the Walton’s billionaire household, the Walmart fortune. At its peak, Theranos had a valuation of $9 billion, making Holmes a paper billionaire. She has retail partnerships with Walgreens and Safeway, has been hailed on the duvet of the journal and has been hailed as the subsequent Steve Jobs, a comparability she wears to a signature black turtleneck (one thing she hasn’t worn within the courtroom). Foster helped.

dominoes fall After the Wall Street Journal investigation in 2015 Reported That the corporate carried out solely a dozen of the a whole lot of assessments supplied utilizing its proprietary blood testing tools and with questionable accuracy. Several months later, the corporate reconciled the outcomes of two years of blood assessments. In 2018, Holmes and Theranos settled down”large scale fraudFees with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Theranos breach soon after.

Government case against him

Holmes now faces nine counts of federal wire fraud and two counts of conspiracy to commit wire fraud. He faces up to 20 years in prison as well as a $250,000 fine and indemnity for each wire fraud and each conspiracy count. He has pleaded not guilty.

Government spent 11 weeks try to solve A complex web of alleged deceit for jurors to prove his case that Holmes intended to mislead investors and patients about the company’s capabilities and business deals for financial gain.

The government called 29 witnesses to testify, including former Theranos employees, retail executives, investors, patients and even a former defense secretary who once served on the company’s board. With that testimony, federal prosecutors attempted to show how Theranos concealed its blood-testing practices, exaggerated its financials, misled investors about the status of the involvement, and used the media to uphold its claims. took advantage of.

Elizabeth Holmes on the stand during cross-examination in federal court on Tuesday, November 30, 2021 in San Jose, California.

Among the evidence presented were: personal text messages from Holmes as well as internal emails, investor presentations, and press interviews. The government also produced reports pasted with the logos of major pharmaceutical companies, with several witnesses testifying that they believed they were produced by the companies and indicating support for Theranos’ technology, When exactly the report was prepared by Theranos.

Witnesses also testified that they were told by Holmes that the company’s technology was being used on military and medical evacuation helicopters, something that – despite Theranos’ desire to do so – never happened. Witnesses testified that they were unaware that Theranos did not rely on its proprietary blood analyzer equipment for testing.

“Why does this fraud work? How does it work? A giant a part of it was the credibility of the mortgage,” prosecutor John Bostic said in his rebuttal on the defense’s final arguments on Friday. “Ms. Holmes has borrowed the credibility of drug firms, of Walgreens, of well-known board members, of the press … and of the army.”

“Associating himself with these people and organizations,” he continued, “he strengthened his credibility of Theranos, and by exaggerating these references, he led others to imagine that Theranos had the legitimacy of these different entities. Should be.”

protection of holmes

In what is mostly seen as a dangerous transfer, Holmes took a stand in his defense – and testified for nearly 24 hours over the course of seven court days.

Holmes said he never acted with the intention of defrauding investors, doctors or patients. In a striking moment, Holmes testified that she herself added the pharmaceutical company’s logo to the report she shared with investors “as a result of this work was carried out in partnership with these firms and that is what I used to be making an attempt to convey.” But Holmes also noted that she listened to witness testimony and wished she “had carried out it otherwise.”

How Elizabeth Holmes' Abuse Allegations Could Affect Her Criminal Trial

Holmes offered himself as appearing in good religion to guard his firm. When, for instance, Theranos hid info that it relied largely on third-party manufactured tools to course of affected person assessments quite than its personal tools, Holmes stated it was with a purpose to defend “commerce secrets and techniques”. it was done. Holmes also testified that he focused his conversations with potential investors on the future. “They weren’t considering at this time or tomorrow or subsequent month,” she said. “They have been considering what sort of change we might make.”

At times, when pressured by the prosecution, he refused. Holmes claimed that he did not say that the company’s technology was deployed on military helicopters for medical use, which previously contested the testimony of witnesses. In other cases, he claimed that he did not remember specific details.

While Holmes testified that the buck stopped by her, she pointed the finger at others too – most notably Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani, the former president and COO of Theranos. In tearful testimony, she alleged that she was the victim of a decade-long abusive relationship with Balwani, her twenty years her senior, whom she met before starting Theranos. (Balwani denies the charges in court filings. He faces the same charges as Holmes and is set to stand trial early next year. He has pleaded not guilty.)

She testified that she considered him her most important mentor in Theranos. “It affected every little thing about who I used to be, and I do not absolutely perceive it,” she said, effectively raising the question of whether she had the power to pull strings at her company at all. There is no capacity.

In closing argument On Thursday and Friday, Holmes’ attorney, Kevin Downey, attempted to reduce the government’s representation of Holmes as someone who, in his description of the prosecution’s argument, “by lies, by deceit, by half-truths.” , created by misrepresentation” firm. Instead, they portrayed him as a great entrepreneur.

“He gave up a college education for which people would give their right hand. He gave up his youth. He left his friends. He gave up his close relationship with his family,” Downey stated on Friday. “Why? Because she believed she was building a technology company that would change the world. That’s our story.”

,

[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *