CNN Requested All 50 GOP Senators If They'd Help The Same-sex Marriage Invoice. Here They're Standing.

[ad_1]

It’s not but clear what number of Republicans will help the invoice, however GOP and Democratic senators stated Wednesday they hope it could finally win the 60 votes wanted.

Here what we discovered:

4 republican senatorsSo far, they’ve both stated they are going to or will help a homosexual marriage invoice handed by the House, and have included: Rob Portman of Ohio, Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska (possible) and Thom Tillis of the North. Carolina (possible).

eight republican senatorshas to date indicated that they are going to vote “no” and oppose the same-sex marriage invoice.

Sixteen Republican Senators, So far, are undecided or haven’t indicated help for the invoice handed by the House.

twenty two republican senators has not but responded to CNN’s inquiry.

Table of Contents

Yes

Susan Collins of Maine Yes on the invoice. He is among the co-sponsors of the regulation.
Lisa Murkowski of Alaska The regulation is prone to be a sure. She stated she was prepared to listen to extra about it, and expressed her help for conserving same-sex marriage authorized. “I have suggested to others that I not only would like to see Roe, Casey and Griswold codify on contraception but that I have also made my support for same-sex marriage clear,” she stated. “So I’ll see what the House is doing and see what that might mean on behalf of the Senate.”
Rob Portman of Ohio Yes on the invoice. He stated holding a vote on the difficulty sends an “important message” and it’s “clear” that Republican views have modified over time. He stated that “his own personal views on this changed” over time. Portman publicly declared her help for same-sex marriage after her son got here out a couple of years in the past.
Thom Tillis of North Carolina informed CNN he would “probably” help a invoice codifying same-sex marriage if it involves the Senate ground.

No

Bill Cassidy of Louisiana Suggested that he’s not on the invoice. He argued that it was a “silly messaging bill”. “It’s a pure messaging bill. I mean, it’s clearly the law just now,” Cassidy stated. “It’s a pure messaging bill by a party that has failed on core issues, whether it’s inflation, crime or limits, and is now looking for cultural issues so that it can somehow get better in November.” When requested if he would vote for it, Cassidy wouldn’t reply. “This is such a silly messaging bill, I’m not going to address it.”
John Cornyn of Texas Told CNN that he’s not on the regulation.
Ted Cruz of Texas Suggested that he’s not on the invoice. Cruz, who publicly disagrees with the Supreme Court’s resolution to legalize same-sex marriage, stated Wednesday that he doesn’t imagine there’s sufficient Republican help to codify the regulation. “I doubt it,” he stated. “If there is a vote, we will see where the votes are.” When requested how he would vote, Cruz nodded, saying: “I support the Constitution and let the democratic process run.”
Lindsey Graham of South Carolina Told CNN that he’s not on this invoice. He stated, “I would support the Defense of Marriage Act”—which might repeal a invoice handed by the House.
Josh Hawley of Missouri According to his workplace, there is not one on the regulation.
Jim Inhofe of Oklahoma Said it was not on the invoice. “Any attempt by Sen. Schumer to codify same-sex marriage in the Senate would clearly be an attempt to divert attention from the Democrats’ failed agenda. That said, my views on marriage have not changed and I will not support codification.” -Sex marriage in regulation,” Inhofe said in a statement to CNN.
Marco Rubio of Florida told CNN that he is not one on the law, adding that it is a “waste of time.”
Roger Wicker of Mississippi Told CNN that she’s probably not on the bill. “I most likely will not be one,” he said, “I do not imagine the Supreme Court goes to the touch this problem.”

undecided or did not indicate support

Richard Burr of North Carolina is undecided. He told CNN on Wednesday that he had not yet seen the bill, when asked if he would vote for it.
Roy Blunt of Missouri told CNN he was not sure and wanted to “watch it and see.” He also raised the question, “What will we really feel obliged to do subsequent?” If the Senate codifies same-sex marriage into federal law. He continued: “I haven’t got an issue with homosexual marriage, however I’m unsure – I need to see the regulation.”
Mike Braun of Indiana told CNN on Wednesday that he was going to wait until the bill was brought to the Senate, then he would look at it.
Joni Ernst of Iowa is keeping an open mind about gay marriage legislation, and she will review the bill before the Senate, according to a spokeswoman for her office.
Ron Johnson of Wisconsin “I have not achieved a full evaluation of it,” he told CNN.
Cynthia Lumis of Wyoming Said she is waiting to read the law.
Rand Paul of Kentucky He said he hasn’t had a chance to see it yet.
Mitch McConnell of Kentucky Asked on Tuesday whether he would vote in support of a House bill that would provide protections for same-sex marriage in federal law, he said, “I’m delaying to announce something on the difficulty when Until we see what the bulk is. Leaders need to lay on the ground.”
Mitt Romney of Utah The bill was noncommittal, telling CNN that the same-sex marriage bill “is not one thing I’ve thought of at this stage” because “I do not see the regulation altering.”
Mike Rounds of South Dakota He said he had not seen the bill. “I already suppose that the truth that we acquired eight to at least one within the Supreme Court, which signifies that this isn’t coming, might be an vital query to start with,” he said. When asked how he felt about same-sex marriage in general, he replied: “I believe there’s a distinction between marriage as a sacrament and a authorized marriage, and so if one desires that type of desires to associate, I’m not against it.”
Rick Scott of Florida told CNN he would like to wait and see, but believes the Supreme Court has already made that decision, when asked if he would support the bill.
Dan Sullivan of Alaska told CNN that they “must evaluation” it. He said he accepts the Supreme Court’s decision legalizing same-sex marriage.
John Thun of South Dakota, the GOP whip told CNN he would take a “more durable look” at the bill, even though he has previously opposed same-sex marriage. Thune said he expects the law to have the same strong GOP support in the Senate as it did in the House. “As you noticed yesterday there was nice bipartisan help within the House and I anticipate that is most likely what you may see within the Senate,” he said. Thune also said that the bill is an attempt to divert attention away from economic issues and high inflation in the medium term. When asked if his own views have changed, Thun would not say anything explicitly. “I acquired an opinion on that, which may be very outdated. But I additionally respect the choice made by the courtroom in 2015,” Thune said.
Pat Tommy of Pennsylvania Asked by CNN whether he would vote for it, he said he had not yet seen the bill.
Tommy Tuberville of Alabama told CNN on Wednesday that he wants to wait and see the full bill. “But I believe individuals ought to have the liberty to do what they need. This is a free nation,” he said.
Indiana’s Todd Young Said he didn’t read. “The particulars are actually vital. Yeah, so really feel extra comfy answering that after studying the regulation,” he said, when asked how he would vote on the measure.