Britain’s Foreign Office says the Kremlin plans to put in a pro-Russian chief in Ukraine

“The misinformation unfold by the British Foreign Office is additional proof that it’s the NATO international locations, led by Anglo-Saxons, which can be rising tensions round Ukraine. We ask the British Foreign Office to cease provocative actions, unfold garbage and calls to focus consideration on finding out the historical past of the Tatar-Mongol yoke,” a representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry told TASS.

CNN contacted the UK Foreign Office on Saturday Further comment on its claims, as well as supporting evidence, but said he would not comment further.

“The data being launched as we speak highlights the extent of Russian exercise designed to destroy Ukraine, and is insightful into Kremlin considering,” UK Foreign Secretary Liz Truss said in a statement.

“Russia should de-escalate tensions, finish its campaigns of aggression and propaganda, and undertake the trail of diplomacy,” Truss said. “As the UK and our allies have repeatedly mentioned, any Russian navy incursion into Ukraine can be a significant strategic mistake with severe prices.”

CNN also contacted the US State Department and the White House for comment.

Source: US has the same ‘information’ as the UK

The White House said in a statement on Saturday that President Joe Biden met with his national security team to discuss “persevering with Russia’s aggressive motion towards Ukraine.”

The President was briefed on the status of Russian military operations on the borders of Ukraine and “mentioned the extent of our ongoing efforts to defuse the scenario diplomatically and our deterrent measures being coordinated with our allies and companions.” of, including the on-going delivery of security assistance to Ukraine,” it added.

“President Biden reaffirmed that if Russia further invades Ukraine, the United States, along with its allies and partners, will impose swift and dire consequences on Russia,” the White House mentioned.

A supply with information of US and British intelligence confirmed that the US has the identical proof because the UK relating to Russia’s plot to determine a pleasant authorities in Ukraine.

“Yes, we have seen intelligence that Russia is looking at ways to ease a long, drawn-out war. This could include things like establishing a friendly government and using its spy agencies to fuel dissent,” the supply mentioned. Huh.”

Another source said the US has “comparable data.”

The Treasury Department imposed sanctions against four current and former Ukrainian officials involved in Kremlin-directed influence activities to destabilize Ukraine. Those newly accepted persons include Taras Romanovich Kozak, Volodymyr Mykolaovich Olyani, Vladimir Leonidovich Sivkovi and Oleh Voloshin.

Sivovich was the only former Ukrainian politician to be named in both the US and UK declarations.

The Treasury said the four individuals — two of whom are current members of Ukraine’s parliament — were acting under the direction of a Russian intelligence service sanctioned by the US and in Russia’s “international affect marketing campaign” to destabilize sovereign countries. Played “varied roles”. In support of the Kremlin’s political objectives.”

US National Security Council spokeswoman Emily Horn expressed solidarity with Ukraine because the UK Foreign Office mentioned it was conscious that the Russian authorities was planning to put in a pro-Russian chief in Ukraine, calling the conspiracy “deeply related”.

“There’s a deep connection to this kind of plotting,” Horn mentioned. “The Ukrainian people have a sovereign right to determine their own future, and we stand with our democratically elected partners in Ukraine.”

Romania, Bulgaria condemn Russia’s calls for to maneuver NATO troops

it comes like this NATO members Romania and Bulgaria rejected Russia’s demand to withdraw coalition troops from each international locations as “unacceptable”, every arguing that the Kremlin had no proper to intervene in international coverage choices of different sovereign states. Not there.

“Such a demand is unacceptable and cannot be negotiated,” Romania’s international ministry mentioned in an announcement on Saturday. Bulgaria’s international ministry urged Moscow to “show respect for the deliberate foreign policy choice made by Bulgaria”. Bulgaria’s ambassador to the United Kingdom, Marin Rekov, advised the BBC that the Kremlin’s demand was “an expression of contempt for Bulgaria’s sovereign right to choose sources of guarantees for national security.”

Russia and NATO have been at loggerheads since late final 12 months, when the Kremlin deployed an estimated 100,000 troops to its border with Ukraine. That navy posture has prompted fears that Russia is planning one other incursion into Ukraine after it invaded and illegally annexed the Crimean peninsula in 2014. That similar 12 months, Moscow started supporting a pro-Russian separatist motion in jap Ukraine, which killed 1000’s.

In its assertion, Romania mentioned that NATO’s navy presence in Eastern Europe is “a desperately defensive response to the increasingly aggressive behavior of the Russian Federation … which began in 2014. When the Ukrainian territory Crimea was illegally occupied by Russia by Russia.” was captured.”

“Despite NATO’s efforts to interact in a constructive dialogue, this conduct is at present intensifying,” the assertion mentioned.

The United States and its NATO allies have repeatedly warned Russia that any motion of its troops into Ukraine’s territory can be a “severe and united response” by US Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has argued in recent weeks that his country is the aggrieved side, and is responding to the eastward expansion of NATO’s cooperation with Ukraine and the alliance since the collapse of the Soviet Union – which Russia calls an existential Sees as a security threat.

Diplomats from all sides have been attempting to negotiate a peaceful solution, although one of Russia’s main demands – the withdrawal of foreign military forces and equipment from NATO coalition members that joined after 1997 – was quickly followed by Western diplomats. Deemed non-starter from .

“NATO allies are prepared to barter with Russia, however we won’t compromise on fundamentals,” NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said earlier this month. “We won’t compromise on the sovereignty and territorial integrity of each nation in Europe, and we won’t compromise on the best of all international locations to decide on their very own path, together with what sort of safety preparations they want to be a part of, and of any of the allies- Will not compromise on the best to guard and defend others.”

Weapons sent to Ukraine

NATO members have deployed military equipment and personnel to members of the Eastern Alliance in recent days in response to Russia’s build-up of forces in Ukraine.

The Dutch defense minister said the Netherlands would deploy two F-35 jets to Bulgaria with support staff in April or May, while Spain’s defense minister had offered to send fighter jets and a warship to the Black Sea.

The coalition has also begun sending weapons to Kiev to deter a possible Russian offensive and strengthen Ukraine’s defensive capabilities.

Light anti-tank weapons from the United Kingdom have already arrived in the country, the Ukrainian Defense Ministry said on Tuesday, while the Czech Republic plans to donate 152-millimeter caliber artillery ammunition to Ukraine in the coming days, the Czech defense minister said. Jan Cernochova said on Friday.

According to the German Defense Ministry, Germany will supply Ukraine with a fully equipped field hospital. The country has traditionally avoided exporting weapons to troubled areas since World War II, but German Foreign Minister Annalena Barbock said earlier this week that if the Russian offensive against Ukraine goes ahead “all Remedies” might be on the desk.